Supreme Court justices who support judicial activism and those who support judicial restraint most disagree on the answer to which question?
A. How many cases should the Supreme Court hear during its sessions?
B. Should the Supreme Court rule on cases that have already been heard by lower courts?
C. How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases?
D. Are amendments to the Constitution as important as the original articles?
Judicial activism refers or pointing to the judicial judgment based on political reasons or it could be due to personal considerations rather the what is written or by-laws. Thus, if a person is a supporter of judicial activism, he would not choose the letter "C" which is "How important is the original intent of the Constitution when deciding cases".
