How does Crusoe differ from the English and Spanish masters he left behind to develop the island?

A. Crusoe survives through hard work and resourcefulness, whereas the other masters were lazy and unproductive.

B. Crusoe believed in the value of women, whereas the other masters only saw them as servants.

C. Crusoe stays true to his Christian religion, whereas the other masters turned to the religion practices of the natives.

D. Crusoe forces the natives to work while he rest, whereas the other masters worked alongside the natives.

This question is based from "Robinson Crusoe Escape from the Island". And based on this story, what makes Crusoe different from the Spanish and the English masters who were left behind to develop the island is that he had survived through working hard and being resourceful, while these masters were unproductive and lazy. The answer is option A.

Answer Link

magfulltime magfulltime · Answer 2 · 2019-05-12T08:45:09+02:00

Answer:

A. Crusoe survives through hard work and resourcefulness, whereas the other masters were lazy and unproductive.

Explanation:

Robinson Crusoe is wrecked and castaway on a disengaged sultry island for a long time. The story might be founded on the genuine beneficial encounters of Alexander Selkirk, a Scottish castaway who kept going four years on a Pacific island, or Henry Pitman,a federal innovator operator castaway from a Caribbean reformatory colony.

Self-sufficiency and diligent work are the methods utilized by Crusoe helping him endure, and particularly cooperating with everyone around him, interestingly with past English and Spanish masters.