Respuesta :
Answer:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Explanation:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Accepting Texas as an integral part of the Union, Clay believed, would destabilize the union, and that rather than acquiring Texas, it would be better to compose and harmonize the existing union.
What was the opinion of clay about the Texas?
Clay believed that accepting Texas was an integral part of the Union would destabilize the union, and that rather than acquiring Texas.
It would be better to compose and harmonize the existing union rather than introducing a new component that would add to the existing element of discord and distraction.
He affirmed that acquiring foreign land for the aim of changing one component part of the public confederacy against some other was wrong, and that it could lead to the Union's dissolution.
Therefore, Clay believed that accepting Texas as an integral part of the Union.
Learn more about the Texas, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14968290
#SPJ5
