Respuesta :
William Marbury most likely supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 because this allowed Marbury to bring his case to the Supreme Court.
EXPLANATION
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) was a very popular the United States Supreme Court decision. The decision became the legal basis for the possibility of conducting judicial testing. This is based on Article III of the United States Constitution. The decision had a major role in helping to establish clear boundaries between the executive and the judiciary.
A Brief History of Marbury v. Madison
The decision originated from William Marbury's problem. He submitted an application to the Supreme Court because he had been appointed as Justice of the Peace in Washington, D.C. by President John Adams, but did not get an appointment letter. Marbury then appealed to the Supreme Court to order State Secretary James Madison to issue the document.
At first, the Supreme Court stated that Madison's action not to publish the letter was wrong. However, the Supreme Court did not give orders to Madison to immediately give the letter. The Supreme Court even explained that the contents of the Judicial Act of 1789 which allowed Marbury to request the Supreme Court was unconstitutional.
The Judicial Act is considered to have expanded the role of the court's jurisdiction beyond the scope of Article III of the United States Constitution. Therefore, Marbury's request was rejected.
LEARN MORE
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
- The Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts: https://brainly.com/question/1755400
KEYWORDS: supreme court, John Adams, judicial act, Marbury v. Madison
Subject: History
Class: college
Subchapter: Marbury v. Madison
He supported Judiciary Act of 1789 because that allowed Marbury to bring his case to the Supreme Court.
Further Explanation:
Marbury V. Madison was the case which established the precedent of Judicial review system in the United States and that means that all the courts in the United States were entitled to strike down laws and decisions made by the government that were violating the constitution of United States. Judiciary act was passed by the Congress in year 1789 and that was done in order to establish a federal system. Congress passed judiciary act in year 1789.
This case came into limelight when Thomas Jefferson was going to be inaugurated as President in year 1801 as the lame-duck Federalist Congress created 16 new circuit judge-ships and under that James Adams wanted to preserve his party control over Judiciary and to Frustrate Legislative agenda of Jefferson. William Marbury who was a federalist leader from Maryland and was among one of the last appointees, did not received his commission before Jefferson was sworn in as President and when Jefferson became President, the first thing he did was to direct secretary of state to impose stay on the commission. Marbury petitioned against it in the Supreme Court and his argue was that signing and sealing the commission was done and its delivery was just a formality but without the piece of preachment, He was not able to enter into duties in his office. President Jefferson was against hearing of this case but Under Judicial act, the Supreme Court decided to hear this case.
Learn More:
1. How did California differ from the United States in terms of interactions of whites and natives?
https://brainly.com/question/7248802
2. Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?
https://brainly.com/question/8891404
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Marbury V. Madison
Subject: History
Keywords: United States, Supreme Court, Thomas Jefferson, James Adams, Judicial Act, Marbury, William Marbury, Commission, Formality.
