Soda bubbles corporation makes and sells soft drinks. talia buys and drinks a soda beverage, which proves defective and injures her. one justification for holding soda strictly liable for the harm caused to talia by its defective product is that
a. soda and talia are in privity.
b. making and selling products are abnormally dangerous activities.
c. soda is in a better position than talia to bear the cost of her injury.

Talia got injured by a defective beverage and so is able to hold Soda Bubbles Corporation liable because c. Soda Corporation is in a better position than Talia to bear the cost of her injury.

Soda Corporation is in a better position to be held liable for this mishap because they are profiting from the sale of the soda beverage.

This profit being made means that they have to take responsibility for the product because they get paid to ensure that their products are safe and if they aren't, they will use their profits to pay for mishaps.

Talia can therefore hold the Soda Corporation liable. Other options are wrong because:

Soda Corporation and Talia are not in a privity
Making and selling products are meant to be safe activities

In conclusion, Talia can hold Soda liable because Soda is in a better position to bear the cost of the injury.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/7012287.