Respuesta :
The best option from the list would be that "Protections for human rights were not in the U.S. Constitution," which is why the Anti-Federalists insisted on there being a Bill of Rights.
C.
Protections for the human rights were not in the U.S. Constitution
That's b/c they (Anti-federalist) want there to be a Bill of Rights and then some of the Anti-federalists would agree to the ratification of the Constitution.