Respuesta :
Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.
Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”
Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.
The court affirmed the practice of racial segregation imposed by the state in a judgment written by Justice Henry Billings Brown.
What was the case of Plessy v. Ferguson all about?
A significant 1896 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court known as Plessy v. Ferguson established racial segregation as constitutional under the "separate but equal" principle.
The court ruled that as long as each race received equal travel accommodations, neither Homer Plessy's 13th nor 14th amendment rights were infringed.
Thus, The court affirmed the practice of racial segregation imposed by the state in a judgment written by Justice Henry Billings Brown.
learn more about "separate but equal" principle:
https://brainly.com/question/17151
#SPJ2
