How has Supreme Court precedent changed your Fifth Amendment rights over time? Check all that apply.
A) Officers can pressure a person to confess to a crime. Officers must communicate a person’s rights to before questioning the person in custody.
B) Officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.
C) Officers can communicate a person’s rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.
D) Officers may create different sets of rules to apply to groups of citizens however they please.

Officers must communicate a person’s rights to before questioning the person in custody.Officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.Officers can communicate a person’s rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.

Answer Link

JackelineCasarez JackelineCasarez · Answer 2 · 2021-10-06T09:30:44+02:00

The Supreme Court model or precedent altered the rights of the Fifth Amendment with time through following ways:

- Officers must communicate a person's rights to before questioning the person in custody.

- Officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.

- Officers can communicate a person's rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.

The 'Fifth Amendment' of the United States entitles several 'rights to the accused under a civil or a criminal case.'

The key points include:

The right to the accused to have a just trial and fair jury.
He/she is also safeguarded from 'self-incrimination' by being silent.
This also provides the authority of knowing their rights before the arrest.
He/she must be provided with their due freedom and property unless the verdict is made by the court.
This also provides a shield from being 'double-charged' (also called dual jeopardy) for a single case.
'Public safety' is given supreme importance.

Learn more about 'Fifth Amendment' here:

brainly.com/question/2055201