Respuesta :

That the bill of rights was unnecessary.

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton on a Bill of Rights. A helpful source is Federalist #84, in which Hamilton shielded the Constitution against the analysis that it came up short on a bill of rights.

The vast majority know this paper due to his case that a bill of rights was hazardous on the grounds that it suggested the presence of forces not enumerated.

Most individuals know this exposition on account of his case that a bill of rights was unsafe on the grounds that it inferred the presence of forces not counted. In any case, Hamilton additionally said a decent arrangement regarding what a bill of rights was that gets disregarded.