Explanation:
John's decision to embark on his journey despite knowing it would break the laws of his people suggests a deeper motivation or conviction driving his actions. While respecting the rules and laws of his community is important to him, there may be other principles or values that he considers equally significant. Perhaps John feels compelled to pursue his journey out of a sense of duty, personal growth, or a belief in a higher purpose that transcends societal norms.
Regarding his position as a future priest, it is essential to consider whether his actions align with the ethical and moral principles associated with his role. While priests may have authority within their religious community, this authority does not necessarily grant them the right to break societal laws. Instead, it may place a greater responsibility on them to uphold moral integrity and serve as role models for others.
In analyzing John's decision, it's crucial to examine the context and circumstances surrounding his journey. Does he believe his actions are justified in pursuit of a greater good, or is he acting out of selfish motives? Evaluating these factors can provide insight into whether John's decision to break the laws is morally defensible and whether his future role as a priest would give him the authority to do so.
To support this analysis, one could refer to passages from the text that explore John's internal struggles, motivations, and moral dilemmas. Additionally, examining how other characters or societal norms within the narrative react to John's actions can shed light on the ethical implications of his decisions. Ultimately, the answer to whether John should have the authority to break the laws depends on a nuanced understanding of his character, motivations, and the ethical principles underlying his actions.
