Step-by-step explanation:
who wrote all the 45° angles there ?
if that were correct angles than the rectangle would be a square, and the angles between the diagonals would be 90° (an angle of 116° would be impossible there).
so, this is all wrong.
a rectangle has 4 vertices. each one has an inner angle of 90°.
so,
angle 1 + angle 4 = 90°
angle 6 + angle 7 = 90°
the diagonals split the angles at the end points of the diagonals in an equal way - just up-down mirrored.
so,
angle 6 = angle 3
angle 1 = angle 5
as the diagonals are congruent, also the neighboring angles are equal (similarly left-right mirrored).
angle 3 = angle 4
angle 1 = angle 7 = angle 5
the sum of all angles around a single point on one side of a line is always 180° (see the line as diameter of an invisible circle with the point being its center : then each side of the line represents a half-circle, and a half-circle stands for 180°).
so,
angle 2 + 116° = 180°
angle 2 = 180° - 116° = 64°
the sum of all angles in a triangle is always 180° too.
so,
angle 2 + angle 3 + angle 4 = 180°
remember, angle 3 = angle 4
so,
64° + 2×angle 3 = 180°
2×angle 3 = 180° - 64° = 116°
angle 3 = angle 4 = angle 6 = 116/2 = 58°
remember
angle 4 + angle 1 = 90°
58° + angle 1 = 90°
angle 1 = angle 5 = angle 7 = 90 - 58 = 32°
FYI : in a rectangle the diagonals do usually not split the angles at the vertices in half. only in squares (as a special form of rectangles).