An attorney in a small law firm represents a pro-gun control organization seeking to overturn a statute that limits restrictions on gun ownership. One of the attorney's partners is a wrong advocate for gun owner's rights. The attorney knows that if the parter were to participate in the representation, the partner could not provide competent representation because of the partner's strongly held beliefs. Therefore, the attorney screened the partner from the matter. The attorney supports restrictions on gun ownership and reasonably believes the attorney will not be influenced by the partner's views. The attorney did not advise the organization of the partner's views nor obtain the organization's informed consent, confirmed in writing. Is the attorney's conduct proper?

A) no, because the partner's conflict is automatically imputed to all the lawyers in the firm, including the attorney
B) no, because the attorney did not advise the organization of the partner's views and obtain the organization's informed consent, confirmed in writing
C) yes, because the partner's views will not influence the attorney
D) yes, because the partner was screened from the matter