Comparisons of cranial capacity between A. africanus and the later species H. erectus and A. boisei show that H. erectus had much larger brains, while A. boisei had only slightly larger brains, than A. africanus. There is evidence that A. africanus and H. erectus used tools, though the tools made by H. erectus required more skill and planning to craft. How do you think the toolmaking abilities of A. boisei would have compared?
(A)A. boisei would have had very little ability to make tools, unlike the other two hominids.
(B) A. boisei would have been able to make more advanced tools than the other two hominids.
(C)A. boisei would have been able to make tools that were less advanced than H. erectus.
(D)A. boisei would have made tools that were less advanced than those made by A. africanus.

According to the study, H. erectus had a larger brain as compare to A. boisei and A. africanus, while A. boisei had a larger brain than A. africanus. It means the H. erectus had much advanced tool-making abilities as compared to A. boisei, so A. boisei would have been able to make less advanced tools than that of made by H. erectus.

Thus, the correct answer is option (C).

Answer Link

Martebi Martebi · Answer 2 · 2022-02-17T12:26:59+01:00

There are different kinds of studies. The toolmaking abilities of A. boisei would have compared to the A. boisei would have been able to make tools that were less advanced than H. erectus.

Based on the study carried out, H. erectus is known to have a larger brain when compare to A. boisei and A. africanus and also the A. boisei also has a bigger brain when compared to A. africanus.

This implies that the H. erectus has high abilities in terms of tool-making than A. boisei. Boisei is known to be a Latin word that implies 'strongly built' which connote a specie that has a robust skulls and jaws.

Therefore, the correct answer is option (C).

Learn more about A. africanus from

https://brainly.com/question/7550546