contestada

Which of the following best explains the size difference between New England farms and southern farms during colonial times?
A) In New England, the soil was rich and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger.
B) In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller.
C) In New England, the soil was rich and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger.
D) In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller.

Respuesta :

mergl
B. is the best choice. New England has a cooler climate than most southern states which limits the length of the growing season. Additionally, the soil was rocky and not as easy to manage as further south. 
kapoorprachi783

In New England, the soil was poor and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller.

The answer is option B.

Was the soil good in New England?

New England had poor soil and a cold climate, however masses of forests and fish. The Middle Colonies had fertile soil, warmer weather, and rivers for transportation. The Southern Colonies had even warmer weather and plenty of waterways in the tidewater.

Was farming hard in New England?

The lengthy cold winters and general harsh climate made huge-scale farming hard. Farms inside the New England Colonies tended to be small subsistence farms, a sort of agriculture wherein human beings lived on what they grew themselves.

Learn more about New England here: https://brainly.com/question/24724492

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas