Respuesta :
The statement is false because the court said the USDA does not have the authority to shut down a plant.
What can go wrong if E. coli-contaminated meat is not discovered and recalled is illustrated by the case of Kevin Kowalcyk. Just twelve days after eating the hamburger that was contaminated with E. coli, he passed away. The movie depicts his mother and grandmother as food activists striving to persuade lawmakers to pass stricter meat inspection rules and regulations requiring the meat business to provide recall letters more quickly. It took 16 days after Kevin's passing before the meat supplier began a recall of the poisoned product. We put our faith in our government to safeguard us, as Mrs. Kowalcyk puts it, but it doesn't. In reality, as the movie demonstrates, the government cannot defeat the food lobby. A 1998 law mandated testing for the viruses Salmonella and E. coli in food, but the food industry sued the US government, arguing that the government lacked the power to close down factories that repeatedly sell contaminated food. The USDA appears helpless to close down facilities that produce contaminated goods. We trust that our government will protect us, says Mrs. Kowalcyk, but it doesn't. In actuality, as the movie illustrates, the government is helpless to oppose the food lobbies. Although testing for Salmonella and E. coli pathogens in food was made mandatory by a law passed in 1998, the food industry sued the US government, arguing that the government lacked the power to close down factories that repeatedly sell contaminated food. To close down factories that produce contaminated goods, the USDA appears helpless. The introduction of Kevin's Law was intended as a direct response to that choice. According to the movie, Kevin's Law will restore the USDA's authority to close down facilities that consistently produce tainted meat. Kevin's mother spent six years trying to influence the USDA through legislation. Kevin's mother says that all she wants is for the business that supplied the contaminated meat to apologize and say that it has precautions in place. When the movie reveals that a USDA Chief once served as the top lobbyist for the beef industry, additional political dimensions to the problem of food safety become clear. The political truth is that the leaders of the government organizations they are tasked with overseeing have a history of connections to the food businesses.
To learn more about E.Coli please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/17975095
#SPJ4
The correct answer is false. Because, the courts said USDA could not shut down a plant that continuously fails inspection.
Department of agriculture doesn't have ability to close down establishes that over and again bomb tests.
"In 1998… USDA carried out microbial testing for salmonella and E. coli. That's what the idea was assuming that a plant more than once bombed these tests, that the USDA would close the plant down since they clearly had a continuous defilement issue. The meat and poultry affiliations quickly prosecuted the USDA. The courts fundamentally said the USDA didn't have the power to close down the plants.
to know more about poultary visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/19218541
#Abcd
