andy hired a lawyer to defend him in a criminal case of stealing a car. andy was found guilty after a four day jury trial, during which his lawyer cross-examined every state witness and direct examined ten witnesses for andy. the lawyer routinely made objections during the trial, and filed a motion to produce evidence, requesting the court to order the prosecutor to provide to the defendant a copy of all witness statements who had any knowledge about the case. andy is unhappy with the result and with his lawyer. to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the andy must:

Respuesta :

Andy must prove that his lawyer's performance was ineffective and that this ineffectiveness resulted in prejudice to his case.

In order to do this, Andy must show that his lawyer's performance was below the standard of care that a reasonable lawyer would have provided and that, but for this below-standard performance, the outcome of his case would have been different.

In order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the Andy must show that his lawyer's performance was deficient and that this deficient performance actually prejudiced his defense. The Andy must show that, but for his lawyer's errors, the result of his trial would have been different.

To show that his lawyer's performance was deficient, the Andy must demonstrate that his lawyer did not provide him with the level of skill and knowledge that a reasonably competent lawyer would have in his particular circumstances. The Andy must also show that his lawyer's errors were so serious that they deprived him of a fair trial.

Learn more about fair trial at : https://brainly.com/question/15669425

#SPJ4

Otras preguntas