In a case whereby a manager in your company is proposing the acquisition of Taylor Company, with a developed a new, innovative product instead of a strategy of developing new products in-house , the arguments that is not correct is (A) the acquisition of Taylor should be primarily for defensive rather than strategic reasons.
An arguments can be described as the set of reasoning that is been dished out so that a particular idea can be supported.
In the case above we can see that the acquisition of the Taylor company is been put under some consideration before it will be gotten , some of the consideration here is that the company have a new as well as an innovative product which can be beneficial to the company that is planning the acquisition.
Therefore, from the argument about the acquisition, then it should follow a defensive strategy.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about arguments at:
https://brainly.com/question/1485606
#SPJ1
Check the missing option:
(A) the acquisition of Taylor should be primarily for defensive rather than strategic reasons.
(B) research suggests that acquisition strategies are a common means ofavoiding risky internalventures.
(C) the outcomes of acquisitions can be estimated more easily and accurately than the outcomes for an internal product development process.
