Scientific evidence must be reasoned (considered) by an individual, because it does not represent absolute proof.

Respuesta :

The given statement, "scientific evidence must be reasoned because it does not represent absolute proof" is true.

  • Scientific evidence can be used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis.
  • However, scientists often utilize evidence in other contexts, such as when they apply theories to real-world issues. Such proof is anticipated to be empirical and interpretable using scientific techniques.
  • Aristotle and Plato are credited with first addressing the subject of reasoning and what constitutes truth.
  • According to Plato, everything can be classified into the discernible and understandable. Deduction is the process by which intelligent things can be known, with reasoning taking precedence over observation.
  • In his inductive method, Aristotle placed a strong emphasis on the necessity of observations as evidence for knowing. He thought that we can only draw conclusions from things that can be seen. We then use reasoning to deduce causes.
  • Newton's groundbreaking work was founded on observations as well as ideas that defied physical explanation (such as gravity).
  • Newton offered four guidelines for scientific method reasoning in his Principia.

Hence, the statement is true.

Learn more about scientific laws here:

brainly.com/question/5505307

#SPJ9