If his cost in these securities was $200,000 and the fair market value of the transferred securities at the time of her death was $500,000. The income tax implication of the transfer of stock is $200,000.
Since we were told his cost in the securities was the amount of $200,000 which means that basis the Harriet that received from the lifetime gift from Andy will be the same basis as that of Andy.
The reason why the basis will be the same is because Harriet died and did not live for more than a year, which in turn means that property is a basis since the property does not qualify as a reverse gift. Hence the basis will be the amount of $200,000.
Therefore If his cost in these securities was $200,000 and the fair market value of the transferred securities at the time of her death was $500,000. The income tax implication of the transfer of stock is $200,000.
Learn more about transfer of stock here:https://brainly.com/question/14259593
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Andy, age 68, has a gross estate currently valued at $2,500,000 that consists primarily of highly appreciated growth securities. Within the last six months, Andy transferred $500,000 worth of these securities to his wife, Harriet. His cost in these securities was $200,000. Harriet recently died. The fair market value of the transferred securities at the time of her death was $500,000. The securities passed to Andy under the terms of Harriet's will.
Which one is an income tax implication of the transfer of stock?
