Suppose that zonosemata flies whose own wings had been clipped and reattached were attacked more frequently than untreated zonosemata flies. How would this result have affected the reliability of the other experimental results?.

Respuesta :

All results for the experimental groups involving wing surgery would be invalid.

Wing surgery in the experimental group would not provide the expected findings since it affects a direct parameter. The fact that these flies are more likely to attack than untreated ones has already been made plain in the question. There might be a number of causes for this, including the possibility that

(1) the reattachment would have failed and/or

(2) the flies' health and fitness would have been at risk.

However, it is not true that because the untreated flies were not attacked, all experimental groups will provide false findings (or less attacked). Similar to houseflies, only zonosemata fly are specified as acceptable. So, the third alternative is likewise not an option.

To learn more about zonosemata fly from given link

https://brainly.com/question/13415172

#SPJ4