The statement of Dr. Watson has no empirical basis. It was a personal opinion hence he ought to be stripped of his honors over views regarding race.
Dr. James Watson was involved in the discovery of DNA. He was an expert and lead researcher at the New York laboratory. The Nobel price as awarded to him in conjunction with two other scientist in 1962 for the discovery of the molecular structure of DNA.
Dr. Watson expressed his views once when he said that Racial equality is not an empirical fact and did not corroborate such with an empirical back up. He merely asked those that don't believe to ask those who deal with black employees.
Because of this, his position at the New York Laboratory was revoked as well as a revocation of his honorary titles. This action of stripping him of is honorary titles is correct because of the possibility of his statement to engender bios and discrimination against people of minority races.
Learn more about James Watson:brainly.com/question/13488623
#SPJ1
