"What they actually want is to look like the highly enhanced version of themselves they see after running their photos
through the photo app filters on their smart phones. The American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery says
that 55% of the doctors it surveyed said the most common reason their patients asked for surgery was to look better in selfies
(Rajanala, Maymone, and Vashi, 2018)."
Susruthi Rajanala, Mayra B. C. Maymone, Neelam A. Vashi, "Selfies-Living in the Era of Filtered Photographs." Journal
of the American Medical Association, vol. 20, Nov/Dec. 2018, pp. 443-444.
Is the article by Rajanala, Maymone, and Vashi credible? Why or why not?
The source is credible because it is a recent study published in a medical journal.
O This source is not credible because 55% is only a slight majority, which casts doubt on the significance of the study.
This source is not credible because plastic surgeons make money from convincing people they can be more attractive
through surgery.
O This source is credible because doctors are trustworthy.

The source can be considered credible because it was published in a medical journal and shows the response of doctors who performed plastic surgery on their patients.

What is a Credible Source?

This refers to the type of source that can be relied on to be factual and accurate, without bias.

Hence, we can see that the given article that is given in the excerpt is credible because it is a recent study published in a medical journal.

This can be explained as the source can be considered credible because it was published in a medical journal and shows the response of doctors who performed plastic surgery on their patients.

Read more about credible sources here:

https://brainly.com/question/1279931

#SPJ1