Respuesta :
The answer is Researchers can use anecdotal evidence to propose new hypotheses, but never as validating evidence. Anecdotal evidence is often unscientific or pseudoscientific because various forms of cognitive bias can affect the collection or presentation of evidence.
What is anecdotal evidence?
- Anecdotal evidence is an informal presentation of evidence in the form of anecdotes or hearsay. The term is generally used in contrast to scientific evidence, particularly evidence-based medicine, which are formal accounts. Anecdotal evidence is often unscientific because it cannot be examined using the scientific method.
- Misuse of anecdotal evidence is a logical fallacy, and is sometimes informally referred to as the "person-who" fallacy The problem with arguing from anecdotal evidence is that anecdotal evidence is not necessarily typical; only statistical evidence can determine how typical something is.
- When advertising or promoting a product, service, or idea, anecdotal evidence is often referred to as a testimonial. The term is also sometimes used in a legal context to describe certain types of testimony. Psychologists have found that people are more likely to remember notable examples than typical examples.
- Because of this, casinos usually try to draw attention to someone who is winning; This makes everyone else think they are more likely to win.
- the fact that people are often afraid of flying after a serious plane crash, even though flying is statistically associated with the same risk as driving a car.
To know more about testimonials and anecdotal evidence, visit:
https://brainly.in/question/53012027
#QWER
