Systek 22 Inc. made a promise to Garrett offering him a job with an annual salary of $150,000 and at least two years of employment. Since Garrett had to move to New York for the new job, Systek 22 also offered to reimburse all of his moving expenses. Based on this promise, Garrett resigned from his job at another firm that offered him an annual salary of $100,000. When Garrett moved to New York, his employment with Systek 22 was terminated, because the company found a candidate who was willing to work for a lesser salary. Which of the following is true of this situation? Group of answer choices Garrett cannot sue Systek 22 since the promise was oral. Garrett cannot sue Systek 22 since the reasons for termination will be accepted in court as a legal detriment. Garrett can sue Systek 22 only for the moving expenses that Garrett can prove he incurred. Garrett can sue Systek 22 under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Garrett cannot file a lawsuit since a promise of employment is always subject to market conditions.