contestada

Instructions: The following argument argues for owning pets. Read the argument and answer the question that follows;

Topic and Question
Pets: Should people own pets?

Ineffective Argument


I love animals so much. I know that animals love humans, so why do people want to ban the ownership of pets? I don't get it.
The first reason I should be able to own a pet is that I love animals. My family loves having a pet. Our dog is like a part of the family. My parents take care of her and take her to the doctor just like they do with me. My mom says, "I don't know
what I would do without little Josie!"
I think that people should own pets because they are helpful. My friend just told me about a neighbor whose pet parrot woke her up in the middle of the night when there was a fire. It saved her life. What a lucky person to own a parrot.
Honestly, what would we do without our pets?


Why is the argument ineffective? In
a paragraph of 7-10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved:
• Claim
• Support
• Conclusion Clincher
• Point of View
• Transitions

Respuesta :

Answer:

This argument is ineffective because, it look like the writer of this make this sound to naive not to bright. It might not be useful to persuade adults in buying a pet for you. This argument didnt support the title to well on "Should people own pets", She talking about her own life so it first person point of view on her own opinion which isnt very sourceful to look at. Therefore she only give out one example which is not enough to support her claim. "The first reason I should be able to own a pet is that I love animals." isnt supporting on should people own pets and that not a good reason to justify herself for her argument. Everybody is different and have a different perspective, she should include more details about people cant survive without there own pets. She should give more than one example on how pets are useful like it could protect you, to in order to let comsumer to think about on how useful pets are. Overall, in Conclusion this argument is not effective for a readers to know about nor to hear about, It a good argument for first person point of view.