contestada

Connexus world history B: unit 4 alternate portfolio.


PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THIS!!!


Bismarck seems to be the stereotypical ‘big man’ who creates historical change through his will and his actions. But historians have criticized ‘big man’ history, arguing that wider forces are more important than individuals in creating historical change. Given the evidence you have read so far, do you think nationalism was more a result of the actions of a few big men, or more the result of wider historical forces? Is Bismarck an exception? *

Respuesta :

annyksl

The question wants to analyze your personal opinion about nationalism and how it affects citizens. For that reason, I can't answer this question, but I'll show you how to do it.

Nationalism is the ideology of unity among the individuals of the same nation. In this type of ideology patriotism, the pride of the nation, and the unitary work of the citizens are encouraged.

Nationalism needs to focus on big names and great national achievements to show the population the greatness of the nation and the need for support and pride.

So, to answer this question, you must reflect on how nationalism is constructed and how Bismarck fits into this concept.

Response structure

  • Introduce what nationalism was and who Bismarck was.
  • Show how important Bismarck was to the concept of nationalism.
  • Show whether figures like Bismarck are essential for the establishment of this concept in society.

More information about nationalism is at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/2788194

Otras preguntas