This is for Gothic literature please help me.

1. What arguments would you make to support the idea that “nurture” is more influential than “nature” on who we become as adults?

2. How do creation stories reflect the culture and time period in which they were written?

3. Are Gothic writers who use their stories to comment on what’s wrong in society successful in getting their message across to their audience?

4. Are Disney movies that are based on medieval fairy tales successful in teaching a lesson or values to the audiences that watch them?

5. How might Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein be seen as a criticism of Victorian society?

p1, Nurture maybe more influential than nature on adulthood since , when going through experiences during adulthood we look back on past experiences from childhood and adolescence to determine on how we react for example when picking jobs in adulthood we'd most likely look back on past experiences to determine which employer to pick.

p2, Whilst many may argue that Nature sticks with us always , Nurture is something that molds us as we as humans naturally adapt with new people and places , many of us push aside our natural selves when in new places varying on how you were nurtured . When you're an adult you'll be put to different places and people where your biological instincts can't help you.

p3,Nurture is how humans have created such pathways for themselves , the places we've been , the people we've seen and the our past have bought us to where we are now . Why can't we say that those same things have affected us more than something we all have . Nurture is something that makes us and shapes us as different people whilst two people can have the same human like instincts they may not all have the same experiences.