Question 1 (2 points)
Saved
Which of the following is the thesis statement?

Question 1 options:

It would improve the economy by spending less money on health issues that can be avoided, as well as excessive spending on advertising and marketing.


Foremost, these regulations would assist in combating major health issues such as obesity.


Government regulation of what we eat and drink is not only fair but worthwhile.


The government should be able to place regulations on what we eat and drink because these regulations would help prevent health issues such as obesity, they would help improve the economy, and they would improve overall public health.

Question 2 (2 points)
Saved
Which of the following is the hook?

Question 2 options:

This shows the grave importance of the issue at hand. The regulations that the government is presenting would help save lives, it would slow down the obesity epidemic, decrease the possibility of heart disease, as well as minimize the risk of cancer in children and adults.


It would help combat serious health issues like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease, as well as lower the risk for illnesses such as cancer. The beneficial changes that these regulations would cause, outweighs the argument given by the opposition. Government regulation of what we eat and drink is not only fair but worthwhile.


Government regulations have historically been implemented to benefit the people of the United States. The Clean Air Act of 1970 for example, was put in place to control air pollution on a national level, as well as provide a healthier and cleaner living environment for the people of the United States of America. The most recent regulation which has ignited a fierce debate is whether or not the government should be able to place regulations on what we eat and drink.


The regulations that the government is presenting would help save lives, it would slow down the obesity epidemic, decrease the possibility of heart disease, as well as minimize the risk of cancer in children and adults. The decision is clear as day, the government should be able to implement regulations on what we eat, for the sake of personal health.

Question 3 (2 points)
Saved
Which of the following is a piece of evidence?

Question 3 options:

There is a long and thorough process in which the government decides whether policies like these are necessary and beneficial to the overall quality of life.


The Clean Air Act of 1970 for example, was put in place to control air pollution on a national level, as well as provide a healthier and cleaner living environment for the people of the United States of America.


Source 2 states "Economists say, obesity and its consequences cost our society $190 billion annually in health care and lost productivity, so health officials increasingly want to find equally effective strategies to discourage people from over-consuming sugary drinks and fast food."


The regulations that the government is presenting would help save lives, it would slow down the obesity epidemic, decrease the possibility of heart disease, as well as minimize the risk of cancer in children and adults.

Question 4 (2 points)
Which of the following is another term for claim in argumentative writing?

Question 4 options:

Thesis statement


Concession


Counterclaim


Rebuttal

Question 5 (2 points)
Which of the following is another term for refutation in argumentative writing?

Question 5 options:

Counterclaim


Thesis statement


Concession


Rebuttal