Using evidence from the harry bingham’s "the annexation of hawaii," explain how the speaker uses constitutional principles to justify the annexation of hawaii.

The evidence which can be used from Harry Bingham's "the Annexation of Hawaii," to explain how the speaker uses constitutional principles to justify the annexation of Hawaii is:

The concept of having a strong defense in the Pacific led to the annexation of Hawaii.

What is the Annexation of Hawaii?

This refers to the conversion of Hawaii as a formal United States territory in response to the increased Japanese presence in the booming sugar trade.

With this in mind, we can see that the major factor which was used to justify the annexation was the booming sugar trade.

Furthermore, there was the need to have a strong military base in the Pacific so that they could better defend themselves from any possible invasions.

Read more about annexation of Hawaii here:

https://brainly.com/question/8862840

annyksl annyksl · Answer 2 · 2022-02-17T11:59:42+01:00

The author used the need to dominate the Pacific to justify the annexation of Hawaii.

Why was the dominion of the pacific so important?

It would increase US resource exploitation.
It would promote trade.
It would prevent possible military attacks on the US.
It would enable US-promoted military attacks.

Bingham uses these concepts to show that the annexation of Hawaii was important and associated with the growth and increase of US power.

More information about Hawaii annexation at the link:

https://brainly.com/question/888867