He smiled. It was a family joke. Whenever anything went wrong, they always blamed Stanley's no-good-dirty-rotten-pig-stealing-great-great-grandfather.

Supposedly he had a great-great-grandfather who had stolen a pig from a one-legged Gypsy, and she put a curse on him and all his descendants.

If a “curse” can be defined as something that causes trouble or harm, which inference best describes the “one-legged Gypsy”?

Respuesta :

Answer:

“A giver of trouble or harm.”

Explanation:

> Since it gives us the definition of a “curse”, we can associate it’s meaning with it.

> As we read through the excerpt, we see that it says “she put a curse on him and all his descendants.” This is saying that she was the giver of the curse.

> Now we can infer that, since “curse” is defined as trouble or harm, and she was the one giving a curse, that the one-legged Gypsy is a “Giver of Trouble or Harm”.

> I hope this helped you understand and correctly and swear the problem, as well as answer any other inquiries on the subject that you may have had. #LearningWithBrainly

Answer:

She was likely to have sought revenge if she felt she had been wronged.

Explanation:

well, she cursed him and all of his descendants so, yea.

good luck :3