Read the excerpt from a high school newspaper. At yesterdayâ€™s debate, tensions were high as the teams waited for Mia Song to state the resolution. Despite the short prep time, Washington team members Enzo Garcia and Nicole Marconi had no problem speaking first, explaining their support for recent actions in the Middle East. The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didnâ€™t have as much supporting evidence. There was a tense hush while the judges deliberated, followed by cheers and applause when Washington won. Which sentence from the passage best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate? At yesterdayâ€™s debate, tensions were high as the teams waited for Mia Song to state the resolution. Despite the short prep time, Washington team members Enzo Garcia and Nicole Marconi had no problem speaking first, explaining their support for recent actions in the Middle East. The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didnâ€™t have as much supporting evidence. There was a tense hush while the judges deliberated, followed by cheers and applause when Washington won.

Question

dtrdtrdtrdtrdrt55571 dtrdtrdtrdtrdrt55571

14-12-2021
English

contestada

Read the excerpt from a high school newspaper. At yesterdayâ€™s debate, tensions were high as the teams waited for Mia Song to state the resolution. Despite the short prep time, Washington team members Enzo Garcia and Nicole Marconi had no problem speaking first, explaining their support for recent actions in the Middle East. The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didnâ€™t have as much supporting evidence. There was a tense hush while the judges deliberated, followed by cheers and applause when Washington won. Which sentence from the passage best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate? At yesterdayâ€™s debate, tensions were high as the teams waited for Mia Song to state the resolution. Despite the short prep time, Washington team members Enzo Garcia and Nicole Marconi had no problem speaking first, explaining their support for recent actions in the Middle East. The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didnâ€™t have as much supporting evidence. There was a tense hush while the judges deliberated, followed by cheers and applause when Washington won.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Sholette Manufacturing Corporation has a standard cost system in which it applies manufacturing overhead to products on the basis of standard machine-hours (MHs

Which of these numbers are 11 units from 0 on the number line? A: 0 B: +11 C: -11 A. A and B B. A and C C. B and C D. C only

A convex spherical mirror with a focal length of magnitude 24.0 cm is placed 20.0 cm to the left of a plane mirror. An object 0.250 cm tall is placed midway bet

The first patient on a Saturday afternoon is a mother of five children. Her medical history states that she is a diabetic patient on insulin therapy. She says t

description of an exothermic reaction?

You are given the following information about aggregate demand at the existing price level for an economy: (1) consumption = $500 billion; (2) investment = $50

Jeannette is participating in a hot dog eating contest. She has already eaten 15 hot dogs but needs to eat more than 32 hot dogs to win. Jeannette is eating 2.7

The sum of all the digits of the integers from 18 to 21 inclusive is 24 (1+8 + 1+9 + 2+0 + 2+1 = 24). What is the sum of all the digits of the integers from 0 t

Uma mãe sempre reserva R$396,00 para dar de mesada para seus dois filhos. As quantias destinadas a cada um são proporcionais as suas idades, que são 12 e 21 ano

Which of the following is true of the biology of hunger with regard to the human body? A. The hormone cytokine helps start the digestion of food, travels to the

OlanmaE OlanmaE · Answer 1 · 2021-12-22T13:22:02+01:00

The sentence from the passage that best shows that the debate was a parliamentary debate is: The Taft team went second, making a strong counterclaim, but their argument didn't have as much supporting evidence.

A parliamentary debate is an academic debate with two opposing sides. Both parties put forward pieces of evidence to support the points that they make during the debate.

In the third option chosen above, we see that elements of academic debate can be seen in the fact that the Taft team made a counterclaim, had an argument but with no supporting evidence.

These descriptions have many features of a parliamentary debate.

Learn more about the parliamentary debate here:

https://brainly.com/question/1695492