Answer:
There are two different one that you could use, both will be cited to original creators.
1) Freedom should not be sacrificed in the name of national security.
During World War II, Japanese-Americans had a tough time. Their freedom was restricted as they were put in internment camps despite the fact that they did nothing wrong.
Due to this, their lives are ruined, some lost their businesses and houses. When they got out of internment, some were put into financial ruin. Also, according to the Constitution, people have liberties to life, privacy, etc and no one should take away such rights.
In conclusion, sacrificing freedom for national security is not ideal.
- topeadeniran2
2) I believe that no, freedom should not be sacrificed in the name of National Security. While citizens want to go to great lengths to protect their country, there are boundaries set that should, and need to remain standing. If freedom is taken away from the citizens, what is worth fighting for? Freedom is a key right belonging to citizens, and that should be unable to be taken away at given moments. Yes, sometimes we need to recognize what is right, but at what cost?
- allieadams4
Explanation:
You can also add anything or take things off if you want. You can thank the creators and not me, I'm just here to help the search become easier. And sorry if it isn't what you're looking for. Have a good day!
People often have different views and opinions. I believed that individual freedoms cannot be sacrificed in the name of national security.
The government can set up laws or enforce strict regulations to help monitor who goes and enters the country. but they should not need to infringe on or restrict the freedom of the American people.
Learn more about Freedom from
https://brainly.com/question/1047335
