Respuesta :
Since Edward Garner was not armed and did pose immediate danger, the supreme court ruled that police were not justified in shooting Edward Garner when he fled from them.
A neighbor called the police to report a probable break-in at the residence next door in Memphis, Tennessee, just before 10:45 p.m. in 1974.
A stranger was seen sprinting through the backyard and attempting to scale a chain-link fence. Officer Elton Hymon, who arrived to the scene with his comrades, fired a single shot because the stranger was unarmed. It smashed through the back of the person's head, scattering his brain all over the fence.
Officers found Edward Garner, who was just 15 years old and weighed barely 110 pounds, when they arrived at the fence. He was in possession of a wallet that contained $10 that had been taken from the residence.
Edward's father filed a lawsuit against the Memphis Police Department, which went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Tennessee v. Garner resulted in a 1985 Supreme Court judgment in favor of the family, establishing that police officers cannot kill fleeing individuals unless they constitute an immediate threat.
Therefore, the supreme court ruled that police were not justified in shooting Edward Garner when he fled from them because he was not armed and did pose immediate danger.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/25095535.
