contestada

How did the Radical Republicans' approach to Reconstruction differ from Lincoln's?

A.
Radical Republicans didn't want the South to rejoin the Union.
B.
Radical Republicans felt Lincoln's approach was too strong.
C.
Radical Republicans felt Lincoln's approach wasn't strong enough.
D.
Radical Republicans wanted to imprison all Confederate soldiers.

Respuesta :

the answer is c, lincolns approach wasn’t strong enough

The Radical Republicans' approach to Reconstruction differ from Lincoln's as Radical Republicans felt Lincoln's approach wasn't strong enough.

Lincoln's proposal was criticised by the Radical Republicans because they felt it was too lenient on the South. Radical Republicans felt that Lincoln's plan for Reconstruction was too lenient because, in their eyes, the South had been responsible for beginning the war and should have been punished accordingly.

Who were Radical republicans and why did they oppose Lincoln?

The Radical Republicans were a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party from the founding of the Republican Party in 1854 until the end of Reconstruction in the Compromise of 1877.

The Radical Republicans disagreed with Lincoln's Reconstruction (1863) conditions because they thought they were too lax. They suggested a "ironclad oath" that would bar Confederate supporters from casting ballots in Southern elections, but Lincoln rejected it. He also vetoed the Wade-Davis Bill after it was enacted by Radicals in 1864. The radicals advocated that the war be waged more aggressively, that slavery be abolished sooner, and that the Confederacy be completely destroyed. The Joint Committee on Reconstruction was under the direction of the Radicals after the war.

Supporting answer

Hence option C is correct answer

To learn more about radical think about Lincolns reconstruction here #SPJ2https://brainly.com/question/27870482