According to Stanley Fish, the reason that speech is always attached to "pre-known" situations and contexts is because advocates of free speech always refer to the First Amendment as the fulcrum for their advocacy without realizing that, in reality, there is nothing like free speech.
Fish gave the example that in the First Amendment, government is not allowed to censor or punish anyone for exercising the right of free speech, while at the same time, the constitution recognizes that free speech is not holistic as it does not apply to private life.
Thus, Fish concluded that the concept of free speech is unstable in application because some "forms of speech" do more harm than good to the concept of free speech.
Read more about references to Stanley Fish's Free Speech concept at https://brainly.com/question/21368946
