Respuesta :
Answer
The protesters supported an unpopular view.
Explanation
According to the First Amendment in the civil rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation..This was when a certain group of the African-American high school and college students marched on the South Carolina State House grounds in Columbia to protest segregation SO the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students' thus according to the Edwards v he protesters supported an unpopular view.
The correct option is [tex]\boxed{\text{A. The protesters supported an unpopular view}}[/tex].
Edward V. Carolina case was the situation which was interfered by the Supreme court who had supported the amendments in the Articles from First to Fourteenth and prevented the administration state administrators to reinforce the petitioners which were meeting lawfully to the anterior side of the statehouse.
Further Explanation:
Supreme court imprisoned, executed, and sentenced applicants who have violated the free power of applicants independence of petition and free association. The Highest authority of Courts also maintained the privileges are guarded by fourteenth amendments and confirmed by the first amendment of the United States. Edwards v. South Carolina was a matter in which the Supreme Court sustained that state government administrators are not permitted to assault the mob to disband if they are unless constitutionally walking in front of a statehouse. The judgment was based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution. The Supreme Court explained that the suspensions were an effort to make illegal the nonviolent appearance of offensive views, and therefore a violation of the marchers’ right of free expression, free association, and independence to appeal for restoration of grievances. The highest authority of tribunal interpreted the detentions and condemnations of 187 protesters was an effort by South Carolina to make unlawful and the favorable appearance of unpopular views where the marcher's efforts were an application of First Amendment freedoms in their most fundamental and classic method. The Court explained the common law violation of breach of the sympathy as not susceptible of specific definition.
Learn more:
1. In the case roe v. wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws? https://brainly.com/question/10483664
2. In Mcculloch v. Maryland, what did the state of maryland argue? https://brainly.com/question/1373726
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Supreme Court Cases
Keywords:
Protestors , supreme court , Edward , South Carolina , amendment , freedom , restoration , grievances, violation , judgement , government , suspension, unpopular.
