Shane is discussing climate change with Brandon. Shane does not believe that climate change is real and is persistent with his belief, trying to convince Brandon that climate change is not real. Brandon does believe that climate change is real but is open to the possibility that he could be wrong. Who would be most likely to engage in critical thinking?

A lot of people can personally testify that Climate Change is real, or you can look it up, more harsher storms, hitting the planet, rising sea temperatures, Ice in the artic are melting rapidly. Many species are dying out, due to their lack of adaption, hotter temperatures, less colder summers. And so much more.

Fun Fact: The Earths Ozone layer repaired itself last year due to all countries of the world agreeing NOT to use the AC unit that was harming it, wish makes some of our hotter tempatures slow!

vaduz vaduz · Answer 2 · 2021-09-01T08:49:50+02:00

Brandon is more likely to engage in critical thinking.

Critical thinking is the ability and choice to engage in rational thinking. It can also be referred to as the judgment through objective analysis and evaluation.

In the given scenario, Shane and Brandon's topic of discussion is global warming.

While Shane doesn't believe in the reality of climate change, Brandon thinks otherwise.

Shane tries hard to convince Brandon that climate change is not real.

On the other hand, Brandon believes in environmental change but is also "open to the possibility that he could be wrong."

This open-mindedness of Brandon shows that he's open to having an objective and rational take on the issue, even if it's against his personal belief.

In between the two individuals, Brandon is more open to other options as compared to Shane. This shows that he is more likely to engage in critical thinking than Shane.

Learn more about critical thinking here:

brainly.com/question/13455198