contestada

The two interpretations of economic history of the early modern period differ most strongly concerning
(1 point)
A.
The motivations for European colonization of the Americas.
B.
The relative importance of Europe in the global economy.
C.
The significance of economic developments in Europe prior to 1500.
D.
The justification for European claims of economic superiority.

Respuesta :

Answer: B. The relative importance of Europe in the global economy.

Explanation:

Parrain

Interpretations of the economic history relating to the early modern period seem to conflict strongly with regards to B.  The relative importance of Europe in the global economy.

In the early modern era of between 1400 and 1800:

  • Some believe that Europe's economy was very important to the development of the world
  • Others believe that the economies of the Arabian and South Eastern Asias had overtaken the Europeans so they weren't very important

These two viewpoints have split the opinions of historians regarding the period such that there are very strong disagreements about which was true.

In conclusion, option b is correct.

Find out more about the early modern period at https://brainly.com/question/16664221.

Otras preguntas