What is the most likely purpose of describing the
amphitheater as an agent of poetic justice?"
Read the passage from "The lady, or the Tiger,"
The arena of the king was built, not to give the people an
opportunity of hearing the rhapsodies of dying gladiators,
nor to enable them to view the inevitable conclusion of a
conflict between religious opinions and hungry jaws, but
for purposes far better adapted to widen and develop the
mental energies of the people. This vast amphitheater,
with its encircling galleries, its mysterious vaults, and its
unseen passages, was an agent of poetic justice, in
which crime was punished, or virtue rewarded by the
decrees of an impartial and incorruptible chance.
O to suggest that the king is a fair and just ruler
to reveal that the trials alvays end the same just way
to show that the building's architecture is a beautiful
site of justice
to impy that justice given out in the arena is not just
at all
Sub

This will determinate in the event that the denounced was blameless or not, there were two entryways, behind one was the woman and behind the other was the tiger, assuming the charged was found honest he wedded the woman, in the event that we liable, he would be killed by the tiger.

The ruler sent the denounced to the field since there they would evidence they were either blameless or liable.

Verbal incongruity happens when somebody implies something contrary to what the person in question implies. In the extract from "The Lady or the Tiger?" the verbal incongruity is that perishing combatants don't do songs.

As a matter of fact, the word composition alludes to an unrestrainedly excited articulation of feeling, which is in opposition to the trepidation and misery that an individual confronting demise can insight on the ruler's field.

For more information about Lady or the Tiger?, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/26958247

#SPJ2