Which of the following statements about using evidence in persuasive and expository writing is true?
A. You should use evidence only in persuasive writing, it's not appropriate in expository writing
B. You need to include explanation of this evidence to show readers your line of thinking
C. You should include only bare statements of evidence to prove that you have no bias,
D. You can't use any evidence in your writing, as this is a form of plagiarism

The true statements about using evidence in persuasive and expository writing is that You need to include explanation of this evidence to show readers your line of thinking.

For better understanding, we need to explain what the answer "You need to include explanation of this evidence to show readers your line of thinking" is all about;

The aim of any persuasive and expository writing is to convince the reader to accept or adopt the writers point of view. The use of evidence in persuasive and expository writing is critical and essential to to the acceptance of the writeup. Provision of facts or evidence without an explanation from the writer will not necessarily be persuasive. To be able to convince your reader to accept or consider your point of view, one must explain what the evidence is implying from their own point of view. An evidence explained can only be persuasive more if the presenter or writer's point of view is shown, that is the evidence is explained to show readers your line of thinking.

So therefore, we can say that the true statements about using evidence in persuasive and expository writing is that You need to include explanation of this evidence to show readers your line of thinking.

You can learn more about persuasive and expository writing from:

https://brainly.com/question/3080650