The writer is considering deleting the underlined portion of sentence 16 (reproduced below).

In short, the e-reader was good for enumeration, but only the printed text enabled interpretation.

Should the writer delete the underlined text?

A. Yes, because it contradicts the writer’s point about complex reading in the paragraph.

B. Yes, because it makes a point that is not supported by any evidence in the passage.

C. Yes, because it adds a level of complexity that is not in keeping with the simplicity of the writer’s main idea.

D. No, because it enhances the writer’s credibility by acknowledging a counterclaim to the argument that print books are superior to e-readers.

E. No, because it provides commentary that explains the relevance of the direct quotation included in sentence 12.

Respuesta :

Answer:

D. No, because it enhances the writer’s credibility by acknowledging a counterclaim to the argument that print books are superior to e-readers.

Explanation:

Correct. The writer should not delete the underlined text, because it enhances the writer’s credibility by acknowledging a counterclaim to the argument. The writer still argues that print books are superior to e-readers, but the writer acknowledges a counterclaim to that argument by stating that e-readers are good for enumeration.

The writer should not delete it because it enhances the writer’s credibility by acknowledging a counterclaim to the argument that print books are superior to e-readers.

What is Author credibility?

A writer's credibility is known to be  the credentials and some unique qualities that shows if or not a source can be trusted or reliable.

Note that a writer's credibility often aid their ideas and arguments in an essay and as such, from the above, writer should not delete it because it enhances the writer’s credibility by acknowledging a counterclaim to the argument that print books are superior to e-readers.

Learn more about e-readers from

https://brainly.com/question/16905975