Summary
Explain how the Dred Scott decision implied that the use of popular sovereignty to determine slavery issues in
the new territories was not legal.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Explanation:The North and the South had been divided for many years over the issue of slavery. The Southern economy was based largely upon cotton, which was grown on large farms called plantations. Enslaved African Americans did most of the work on the plantations. The Northern economy relied more on manufacturing and used paid workers.

Neither the North nor the South wanted the other’s ideas to spread to U.S. territories in the West. Northern states wanted to stop the spread of slavery. But Southern states believed that the U.S. government did not have the right to decide whether slavery should be allowed in a state or territory.

The North and the South had been divided for many years over the issue of slavery. The Southern economy was based largely upon cotton, which was grown on large farms called plantations. Enslaved African Americans did most of the work on the plantations. The Northern economy relied more on manufacturing and used paid workers.

How did the Dred Scott decision affect slavery in the territories?

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case struck down the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional, maintaining that Congress had no power to forbid or abolish slavery in the territories.

Learn more about Dred Scott here: brainly.com/question/14451024

#SPJ2