Brody said Stock G had a greater price change because a positive integer is greater than a negative integer. Is his statement correct? Explain why or why not.

Respuesta :

No if stock G had a price increase of 2$ and stock F had a stock decrease of a -2$ then stock G and stock F had the same price change 2$

Answer:

No, his statement is not correct. Brody confused value and magnitude. |–4| = 4, and |+1| = 1. The magnitude of –4 is greater than the magnitude of +1. Stock F had a greater price change.

Step-by-step explanation:

sample response :))