Neil Thisse is a Loyalist who fled the colonies during the Revolution and has returned to reclaim his property in Dover, MA. According to the Treaty of Paris, he is entitled to his land. However, Massachusetts has passed a law that ignores the claims of former Loyalists. Charles appeals to the Articles for the return of his property. can the articles of confendence slove this problem? why and why not?

According to the particular situation of Neil Thisse, the Articles of the Constitution could not have helped him to recover property rights of his land.

Explanation:

Although Mr. Thisse was a Loyaist, the new rules of the Continental Congress and the state delgates were still struggling to consolidate the new government. In accordance to the Articles and the Treaty of Paris, Mr. Thisse did not have option to negotiate with the local government of MA an agreement to reclaim his manor.

scouteo scouteo · Answer 2 · 2021-10-27T03:26:48+02:00

Although Thisse appealed to the Articles for the return of his property, he had not been successful for the following reasons.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the central government became weak.
The real power was in the states.
The states remained sovereign and had the power to collect money through taxation.
If the central government needed money, it had to ask for it from the states.
This gave the states the authority to rule over decisions of property, as was the case of Massachusetts.
That is why although Thisse had appealed to the Articles of Confederation, he had no chance to be successful.
The Articles of Confederation was the original Constitution of the United States.

We conclude that the Articles of Confederation left a weak central government that depended on the states for many things, including the possibility to collect money.

Only the states could get money through taxation.

Learn more about this topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/16379544?referrer=searchResults