Answer:
It is easier to reach a conclusion of causation from an experimental study than from an observational study because an experimental study is backed by evidence whereas an observational study is speculative.
Explanation:
An observational study is based on what appears to the eyes whereas an experimental study has facts and logical proof to connect the hypotheses to the conclusion. Before conclusions are reached in experimental studies, tests are conducted and stakeholders who are representative of the population are surveyed to obtain accurate data that can be further analyzed.
Observational studies are simply speculative and based on guesswork that cannot be relied upon.
The main reason that it is easier to reach a conclusion of causation from an experimental study than from an observational study is that an experimental study is backed by evidence.
It should be noted that an observational study is a study that's based on the observation of a group in order to derive a conclusion.
An experimental study is usually based on facts and the data gotten is analyzed in order to derive a conclusion. Therefore, it's more accurate and therefore easier to reach a conclusion.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/15089051
