Respuesta :
Thank you for posting your question here. Below are the answer:
1. D - It ruled that segregation was unconstitutional and that efforts must be made to achieve integration.
2. The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "limitation of public school students' Constitutional rights." The issue that was debated in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case is that of limitation of public school students' Constitutional rights
3. B.)to provide protection for the rights of every citizen
4. C.)It connected the enforcement of the Civil Rights Act to educational funding.
1. D - It ruled that segregation was unconstitutional and that efforts must be made to achieve integration.
2. The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "limitation of public school students' Constitutional rights." The issue that was debated in the Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education case is that of limitation of public school students' Constitutional rights
3. B.)to provide protection for the rights of every citizen
4. C.)It connected the enforcement of the Civil Rights Act to educational funding.
1. The approach the Warren Court took to the issue of segregation is that he ruled that segregation was unconstitutional and that efforts must be made to achieve integration.
2. The quotes was to provide protection for the rights of every cit
3. The law related to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is that it connected the enforcement of the Civil Rights Act to educational funding.
What is integration?
Intergration allows the inclusion of everyone without any bias.
It does not allow some people to be preferred yo another but rather share all opportunity equally.
Learn more on civil rights below
https://brainly.com/question/131269
#SPJ5