Answer:
The phrase that indicates that the court does not think encouraging proper treatment of the flag is the same as legally requiring proper treatment of the flag Is:
"It is not to say"
Explanation:
All right, in this case, we are watching that there is a very big misconception here based on the first amendment and the treatment of the flag. First o all we need to understand freedom of speech does not apply when we commit violence or aggression against someone else. In this case, one of the biggest symbols and icons of patriotism, liberty justice, and our rights. Thus, the case focuses on why the court makes emphasis on encouraging proper treatment of the flag based on everything it represents or legally required to treat it properly.
