barry54
contestada

PLEASE HELP!!

Mai has proven that triangle WYZ is congruent to triangle WYX using Side-Side-Side Triangle Congruence Therom. Why can can she now conclude that diangonal WY bisects angles ZWX and ZYX?

a. Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.

b. Alternate angles are congruent.

c. This is a quadrilateral.

d. The angles are not congruent.

PLEASE HELP Mai has proven that triangle WYZ is congruent to triangle WYX using SideSideSide Triangle Congruence Therom Why can can she now conclude that diango class=

Respuesta :

kelseyhenry11029
b is the answer to this question
akposevictor

Since Mai has proven triangles WYZ and WYX to be congruent by the SSS triangle Congruence Theorem, she can conclude that:

Diagonal WY bisects angles ZWX and ZYX because:

  • all corresponding parts of both triangles are congruent. (Option A).

If two triangles are proven to be congruent to each other, it means that all three pairs of corresponding sides and angles of both triangles are congruent and equal to each other.

Thus, since Mai has proven triangles WYZ and WYX to be congruent by the SSS Triangle Congruence Theorem, therefore, all corresponding parts of both triangles are congruent.

If this is so, then Mai can conclude that angles ZWX and ZYX are bisected by diagonal WY. (Option A is correct).

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/19520446

Otras preguntas