Respuesta :
Answer:
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the data support the hypothesis that the mean depression score for ALS caregivers is significantly higher than the cutoff score for depression of 25
dependent/outcome variable
Generally the dependent variable is Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores because the score are dependent on the ALS caregivers
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 20
The population mean is [tex]\mu = 25[/tex]
The sample mean is [tex]\= x = 28[/tex]
The standard deviation is [tex] s = 3.0[/tex]
The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : \mu = 25[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a : \mu > 25[/tex]
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as
[tex]z = \frac{\= x - \mu }{ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]
=> [tex]z= \frac{ 28 -25 }{ \frac{3.0}{\sqrt{20 } } }[/tex]
=> [tex]z= 4.47[/tex]
Generally the probability of z from the z- table is
[tex]p-value = P(Z > 4.47) = 0.000[/tex]
From the values obtained we see that [tex]p-value < \alpha[/tex] hence
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the data support the hypothesis that the mean depression score for ALS caregivers is significantly higher than the cutoff score for depression of 25
Generally the dependent variable is Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores because the score are dependent on the ALS caregivers