In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?
Their action did not negatively influence other students.
Their action was not disruptive.
Their action occurred off school grounds.
Their action was political speech.

Respuesta :

The court determined that the First Amendment applied to public schools and that school authorities could only prohibit student expression if it interfered with the instructional process.

Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court decided that students' right to wear them was protected under the First Amendment.

So, Option B is correct.

The other Options are incorrect as:

  • Option A is incorrect as their actions may have influenced other students negatively so this is not the correct option.

  • Option C is incorrect as wearing a black armband off school does not matter to the supreme court it favored students because it was not disruptive.

  • Option D is incorrect as the action was a political speech but it does not matter as it was not disruptive.

Thus Option B is the correct Option as this was the reason the supreme court favored the black armbands.

For more information about the black armband refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/21786718

Answer:

its B

Explanation:

ifunny is dankreloaded